In a recent address, the presidency, through Special Adviser on Information and Strategy Bayo Onanuga, voiced strong criticism toward former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, urging him to shift focus from political ambitions to constructive dialogue on Nigeria’s pressing issues.
This exchange signals the deepening political tension and highlights the contrasting visions between Nigeria’s current leadership and prominent opposition figures.
The presidency claims that Atiku, who ran against President Bola Tinubu in the 2023 elections, continues to challenge Tinubu’s administration with counter-proposals that were already scrutinized and ultimately dismissed by the electorate.
According to Onanuga, Atiku’s recurring critiques and alternative policies reveal his discontent over the election outcome.
The statement suggests Atiku may be preoccupied with unseating Tinubu rather than addressing the structural challenges facing his own party, the People’s Democratic Party (PDP).
Atiku’s economic perspectives, particularly his critique of Tinubu’s subsidy reforms, formed a focal point of the presidency’s statement.
Atiku has advocated for a phased subsidy removal, referencing global precedents such as Indonesia, while Tinubu’s administration has moved towards immediate and comprehensive changes.
The presidency argued that gradual subsidies lead to long-term fiscal strains, asserting that Tinubu’s “bold reforms” are necessary to revive Nigeria’s economy.
Onanuga’s statement also casts Atiku’s ongoing claims of election malpractice as signs of entitlement and an unwillingness to accept the 2023 election results.
Atiku’s suggestion of a hypothetical presidency — describing what he would have done differently — is portrayed as both unrealistic and contrary to the needs of a nation grappling with complex challenges.
This discourse comes amidst various reactions from political analysts and citizens. Some see Atiku’s input as a necessary part of democratic checks, while others view it as a disruption to national unity. Analysts argue that both the presidency and opposition figures need to focus on the issues that resonate with Nigerians, such as economic recovery, inflation, and security, rather than engaging in counterproductive disputes.
Ultimately, the presidency’s call underscores the importance of moving from confrontational narratives to collaborative approaches that prioritize the nation’s welfare over individual ambitions.
As the nation faces socio-economic hurdles, the need for a more cooperative and issue-focused political environment remains paramount.